AGC of America Member Login AGC of America HomeAGC of America About AGCAGC of America Contact UsAGC of America Find a ContractorAGC of America Find a ChapterAGC of America
Print this Page Sitemap Email to a Friend
NOV/DEC 2005:

Cover Story:
Gulf Coast Contractors Scramble Back to Work

Features:
What We Build:
Katrina Update: Some Mississippi-area Contractors Finding Work
Katrina Update: Louisiana Firms Struggling
Seattle Tower Project Connects Art and Business
Issues & Trends:
Industry Ethics Questioned

Departments:
The Punchlist Profile
Legal Commentary
Information Technology - Design-Build Solution
- Primetest 100 and 200

Inside AGC:
President's Message
CEO's Message
Chapter Corner
Midyear Recap
Industry Issues
Advocacy Update

 

 

View all archives >>
<< Home

 

Departments — November/December 2005

Colorado Contractors Association's Tony Milo

The state's contractors scored a big victory in the November elections

By Diana Murphy

Tony Milo
EXECUTIVE DIRECTOR
Colorado Contractors Association

Born Bronx, N.Y.
Age: 40
Married to Catherine. Two children: Alexandra, 10; Tommy, 8

Education
> B.A., James Madison College of Michigan State University, 1987
> M.A., Business, Aquinas College, Grand Rapids, Mich., 1993

Career Highlights
> Deputy Director, Michigan Asphalt Paving Association, 1990 -1995
> Executive Vice President, Michigan Road Builders Association, 1996 -2005 Led push for gasoline tax in Michigan in 2001, which doubled funding for Michigan state highway program
About Colorado Contractors Assn.
Founded in 1933, 370 members
Web site: www.coloradocontractors.org

Tony Milo took the reins earlier this year as the new executive director of the Colorado Contr-actors Association, AGC's heavy/ highway division in the state.

Milo, 40, has spent his entire career working as an association professional advocating for business and highway construction. Before joining CCA, he was executive vice president of the Michigan Road Builders Association, the state's heavy/highway and ARTBA chapter for nine years. Before that, he served as deputy director of the Michigan Asphalt Paving Association for six years.

In Milo's short tenure in Colorado, he has already seen some major changes.

The passage of the federal highway bill earlier this year was a big boost for the state, which could receive as much as $2.46 billion over the next five years, a 46.8% increase over the state's average TEA-21 funding.

"The industry had waited too long for that," says Milo. "Roads and bridges here are suffering because of it."

Although passage of the federal transportation bill was a big relief for Colorado, that alone couldn't pull the highway industry out of financial doldrums caused by years of state budget cuts. Colorado Gov. Bill Owens said recently that the state's transportation budget has declined 41 percent since 2001, largely because of a budget-limiting referendum passed back in 1992. Dubbed the Taxpayers' Bill of Rights, or TABOR, it limits budget increases to a percentage of population growth plus inflation and requires that any money collected beyond that formula be refunded to taxpayers.

However, in November, Milo and his CCA brethren led a broad coalition of civic and business leaders in the successful passage of a referendum that gives the state a five-year break from TABOR limits.
By 52 to 48%, Colorado voters approved Referendum C, allowing the state to keep $3.7 billion that would have been refunded to taxpayers under TABOR.

Referenda C & D presented a solid plan for Colorado's economic
recovery without increasing taxes.

However, they rejected-by 50.6 to 49.4%-Referendum D, a companion measure that would have let the state immediately borrow $1.2 billion to fund transportation projects. Because of that, the state's heavy/highway contractors will have to wait until the next legislative session to see how much Referendum C money can be spent on highways.

Milo characterized the Nov. 1 election as a "75 percent victory" for the state's heavy/highway industry. "It's certainly not all doom and gloom," he says. "The fact that C passed is a tremendous positive for the state of Colorado and, ultimately, for roads and bridges. Now, there is money for transportation. We're going to have to fight for our fair share, but I think we're in the best position to claim it. [Referendum] C would probably not have passed if the industry had not stepped up to support it the way we did."

Had C been defeated, the funding situation would have been grim.

"We would have been stagnant," Milo says. "We'd have had the same amount of funding we had but continue to lose purchasing power due to continually having to put off much-needed infrastructure improvements."

Colorado's industry has other reasons for optimism: the ongoing $1.6 billion Transport-ation Expansion Project in southeast Denver will finish a year from now, and there's the start of the nearly $5 billion FasTracks mass transit initiative-approved by Denver-area voters in November 2004.

"There are definitely bright signs on the horizon that suggest the public and our elected officials are beginning to realize the importance of reinvestment in infrastructure," Milo says. "We've worked aggressively to increase our profile at the [state] Capitol, and now that's beginning to pay off."

 

 

Constructor is a publication of McGraw-Hill Construction [ © 2007, all rights reserved ]
Terms of Use | Privacy Policy | Contact Us